World Cup 2018: 12 stadiums finished, 108 in the ether

Photo: The Samara Arena stadium construction, February, 2016


In April, 2016, the FIFA inspectors visited Russia to check on the preparation of the stadiums for 2018. On the whole, the officials were satisfied with the course of the work.

It should be remarked that the construction began badly: for example, the location of the Ekaterinburg Arena in the Urals had been discussed for two years.

The Samara Arena first was supposed to be erected in the Samarka River valley, but then the location was moved to the other end of the city. Besides this, the construction process was delayed because of a conflict with the residents of nearby houses who were to be resettled. But these are not all of the problems the Samara stadium has: it has become known recently that its construction is at risk of failure. The contractor (PSO “Kazan”) has demanded an increase in the estimated price. According to the company directors, it is impossible to build such a big sports facility for the initial 13 bln rouble price.

As a result, the regional government had to change contractors, but there is some doubt as to whether the new company will meet the cost.  

The Samara stadium is one of the largest objects of World Cup 2018: its area and volume are much larger than the other stadiums, even the large ones such as Kazan Arena and Moscow Luzniki. Many experts have remarked upon the unjustified scope of the object and think that the initial cost was too low. “The stadium project turned out a third bigger than other similar sports facilities, and it ate up over 20 bln roubles. More than 40% of its area is meant for commercial use. There are a lot of potential solutions. Now, a reduction of the project is being considered”, Alexander Khinstein, Deputy of the State Duma, said at a press conference in Samara at the end of April. His claim about “multibillion rouble corruption in the Samara region” before the FIFA delegation’s visit to Samara caused a conspicuous scandal. “In my opinion, it is a deception of the federal center and the government. Competent authorities will study the case. We’ll see the results of their work”, the parliamentarian said.

It may be a moot point, but even Vitaly Mutko did not know the exact sum needed from the federal budget for the construction of the stadium in the regional city. “Governor Merkushkin wanted to create a significant heritage object: a vast stadium. A whole recreational area has been designed, and we still cannot determine the final cost”, the RF Minister of Sports admitted

The situation in Samara is not an organizational failure, but a systematic failure. That’s what the President of the Estimator-Engineers’ Union, Pavel Goriachkin said: “The state is in a maze with the construction’s estimated costs! Builders do not want to go bankrupt at significant state construction sites, and do not want to go to prison as a “present” from the state. Inadequate prices and contract conditions, blackmail and under-the-table payment, constant inspections, delinquency… that’s what constructors expect at such objects, he said and added, “Very large, serious, respected construction companies have been “burnt” lately at state construction sites, and this negative tendency will continue”.

We are going to watch the development of the conflict concerning the stadium in Samara, but now nous revenons à nos… stadiums. 

To be remade

The first project for the “Volgograd Arena” sports facility in Volgograd was rejected by the state expertise after they pointed out 40 ‘punch’ points. In Rostov-on-Don, the Russian Technical Supervisory Authority went to the law courts with the general contractor for the usage of piles of lower quality than identified in the documents.

Photo: The Volgograd Arena stadium construction

Kazan Arena, erected for the 2013 Universiad, turned out not to be ready for the football competitions either. While preparing for the Water Sports World Championship that took place in the capital of Tatarstan last year, the stadium was transformed into a swimming center. All these facilities are to be dismantled for 2018.

The famous Fisht stadium in Sochi, in which the opening ceremony of the 22nd Winter Olympic Games took place, turned out not to meet FIFA requirements. In particular, the roof over the play zone must be dismantled and side tribunes must be built. This work is to be completed this year.  

The reconstruction of Moscow’s Luzhniki Stadium, for the first and the final matches, is much more successful. According to the plan, all construction work at the object is to be completed in December, 2016, and the stadium is to be put into operation in February, 2017. To remind you, all facilities for track and field have been removed and the stadium has become nothing but a football pitch. That’s why it is the most complicated object of 2018 World Cup. The designers and constructors were given the task of preserving the unique historical look of the stadium, and yet still making it a modern object regarding the use of technology.

Kaliningrad Stadium is also worth mentioning. Its construction started later than the others, but the work is proceeding fast. The arena has its shape: by the end of April the foundation was poured, and metal structures are being assembled now. At the same time, the preparation work for the roof assembly has started. 

Can’t live without corruption

Zenit Arena in Saint Petersburg is a whole different thing. It is the most long-delayed of all Russian stadiums. It has been in the process of being built since 2007, and its budget has grown from 6.7 bln roubles to almost 35 bln.  

The construction was first supposed to be financed from local sources and the city budget, but in 2012 it became clear that the money was not sufficient. In September, 2012, the construction site was visited by Dmitry Medvedev and it was then decided that the money would be allotted from the federal budget. “It is not simply a long-delayed construction project, it is a source of shame”, the Prime Minister said at that point. As a result, the matter was delayed and, according to the city authorities, the object will be commissioned in December, 2016.

The construction of the arena has been accompanied by corruption scandals fit for a novel. The latest news: the Vasileostrovsky district court of Saint Petersburg obliged the Director General of one of the subcontracting companies, Dmitry Korshunov, to pay back more than 570m roubles of the city budget’s money. 

Mr Korshunov’ company, “Stary Gorod” (‘Old City’) dealt with the arrangement of cast piles at the stadium. Later it turned out that the price of the piles was set twice as high as it should have been, which led to a cost increase by more than 500m roubles.

And if we compare…

So, how much will the Russian stadiums constructed for 2018 cost if we compare them with modern foreign analogs (see table)?

To make a correct comparison, according to engineer-estimator Pavek Goriachkin, one should not use the official euro rate from the RF Central Bank, but the so-called “calculated rouble and euro parity index referring to the cost of construction and assembly operations” (purchasing power parity in construction). The given parity is calculated based on the cost of similar construction resources in Russia and in, say, Europe. For example, the euro rate for the adapter fitting cost is about 110 roubles to the euro, and ready-mixed concrete is 64 roubles to the euro.

The sense of parity is to show not what a conventional set of construction resources (labour payments, materials, equipment, etc.) costs in a given country but in terms of foreign currency. “According to our assessment, such parity in construction is about 46-52 roubles to the euro”, thinks the President of the Engineer-Estimators’ Union.

As a reference point, at the point of this article’s publication, the official rate of the All-European currency in Russia was 74.11 roubles to the euro. 

Simpler and cheaper

It should be noted that since the moment of being awarded the World Cup 2018, the Russian authorities have strived to organize the competition like they did the Sochi Olympics, i.e. without scrimping.  But, as we have already said, life has intruded, and some non-standard architectural solutions had to be rejected and the number of seats for spectators had to be decreased. For example, an unusual roof was planned to look like the Don River, and in Kaliningrad a unique entrance overhang resembling a Baltic wave was to be built, but in the end a simple standard framework of ready-made structures will be erected there.

The stadiums’ capacity has been significantly reduced: the total number of seats will not surpass 580,000. To compare: at the World Cup 2014 in Brazil and at the World Cup 2006 in Germany there were about 660,000 seats. Besides, part of the tribunes will be temporary and after the event they will be dismantled, decreasing the total number of seats to 496,000.

Looking forward to the event

Worldwide experience shows that holding such grand events as Olympics or World Football Championships changes the face and character of many cities, and even regions. For example, after the Olympics in Barcelona in 1992, the city got a reputation for being one of the most visited tourist centers in Europe, and indeed in the world. Calgary became a popular ski resort after the first Canada Winter Olympic Games: the number of tourists visiting the city annually has reached 3m people.

Will such changes happen with our Russian cities? Let’s hope so.

Millions of spectators are currently looking forward to the moment when the referee blows his whistle, and the worldwide feast of football starts.

Our journal will keep a careful eye on the course of the construction work at the World Cup objects, and we will tell you about the new stadiums in detail.


Vladimir GURVICH



The name of the stadium




Stadium capacity (number of seats)


Construction cost (m euro)


The year of opening


Construction cost of one seat (euro)


Wembley stadium


90 000



10 137

Emirates Stadium



60 335



7 292

Grand Stade Lille Metropole


50 157




Melbourne Rectangular Stadium


30 050



6 179

Lvov Arena


34 915



6 043

Friends Arena


50 000



6 000

Donbass Arena


51 504



5 706

Allianz Arena


69 901



4 864

Astana Arena


30 000



4 524

Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium


48 459



4 416

Gdansk municipal stadium


43 615



4 260

Bucharest national stadium


55 600



4 209


Le Mans

25 000



4 080

Stade Oceane


25 178



4 011

Arena do Gremio


60 540



3 955

Forsyth Barr Stadium


30 748



3 666

BBVA Compass



22 039



3 472

Amex Community Stadium


22 500



3 380

Juventus Stadium


41 000



3 049

Turk Telecom Arena


52 650



3 049

Stozice Stadium


16 038



2 681

AFAS Stadion


17 023



2 232

Hypo Arena


31 957



2 097

Grand Stade de Tangier


45 000



1 778

Estadi Cornella El-Part


40 500



1 531

New Tivoli


32 900



1 520

Impuls Arena


49 000



1 327

Coface Arena


33 500



1 313



The cost of the construction of the recently built stadiums as calculated for one spectator’s seat


Source: KPMG

--> back to