Enes
Moscow
WINNER OF THE RF MINSTROY MEDIA COMPETITION 2016
Go to mobile

LATEST NEWS

16:23 26-06-2017
Mongolia to join construction of Asian Super Grid
16:04 26-06-2017
$50-million stock breeding complex to be built in Russian Far East
15:40 26-06-2017
Fast neuron reactors help to make atom “green” – Rosatom’s head
15:07 26-06-2017
New bridge across Ob River in Siberia to be funded from federal budget
14:45 26-06-2017
Austrian Strabag to build musical road in Hungary
14:09 26-06-2017
Company with Turkish capital to build first phase of Saratov airport
12:55 26-06-2017
Ismailov’s mall in Las Vegas seized for debts to Bank of Moscow
12:19 26-06-2017
Jewish community gets historic synagogue in Simferopol
11:49 26-06-2017
Sales of new buildings in USA grew by 3%
11:22 26-06-2017
Georgia completes construction of its largest nuclear power plant
10:39 26-06-2017
Using Nord Stream 2, Russia takes revenge on Ukraine - Poroshenko
09:50 26-06-2017
Russian billionaire’s company buys British Holland & Barrett
16:56 23-06-2017
Cabinet of Ministers allotted land plot for construction runway-3 in Sheremetievo
16:31 23-06-2017
KamAZ to invest €50m in production in Senegal
14:46 23-06-2017
Lukoil won a tender on supply of 2,700 tons of oil to Severstal enterprises
14:17 23-06-2017
President Putin to control pipeline mating at the Turkish Stream construction
13:37 23-06-2017
Reconstruction of Moscow conservatoire to be completed
13:26 23-06-2017
Thrill rides to be built in Moscow Luzhniki
12:54 23-06-2017
Unique green roofing to be built in Moscow during renovation
12:32 23-06-2017
The Chinese participating in Moscow Metro construction
11:16 23-06-2017
Grand fraud discovered at a business centre construction site in Krasnoyarsk
18:02 22-06-2017
Rostec to restore enterprise producing acoustic equipment
17:50 22-06-2017
Seven plants to open in Dubna special economic zone
17:35 22-06-2017
Putin heads for Anapa to control Turkish Stream pipeline link-up
17:12 22-06-2017
Heineken sells its brew-house in Belarus
16:53 22-06-2017
Tesla signs preliminary agreement on plant building in China
16:35 22-06-2017
Industrial warehouse in northern Moscow put on auction for $751,000
16:02 22-06-2017
China suggests project for Changchun – Vladivostok high-speed railway
15:33 22-06-2017
Europe’s gas demand exceeds Nord Stream 2 capacity, Wintershall says
14:56 22-06-2017
Poland to demolish 500 monuments to Soviet soldiers
All news

ARCHIVE NEWS

«    June 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 

Collecting the only housing: why the implementation of the Justice Ministry’s bill draft is doubtful

logo russianconstruction.com
Collecting the only housing: why the implementation of the Justice Ministry’s bill draft is doubtful

The RF Justice Ministry’s initiative cannot be realised. Why?

Since the beginning of the year the RF Justice Ministry’s initiative has been discussed in Russia – the bill draft lifts a ban on the seizure of debtors’ only housing under enforcement proceedings.  Opinions are different but negative assessments prevail.  To clear out the pitfalls of the initiative we have talked with Valery KLIMOV, member of the Central Headquarters of the All-Russia People’s Front, Head of the project, “For the Rights of Borrowers”. 

 

— Mr Klimov, what is the essence of the problem, what was the spark that set the forest on fire?

— Actually, the Justice Ministry suggests limiting immunity from the collection of the only housing suitable for living, owned by a citizen-debtor, under debts enforcement. This immunity is determined by art. 446 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Of course, people and the media perceive it as rendering a person homeless because of debts. What is more important, however, is that experts also see serious risks in the proposed solution. 

It should be noted that the bill draft was not an initiative and, in fact, is a sort of delayed reaction to the RF Constitutional Court’s decision, dated 2012.

To remind you, at that time the Constitutional Court considered a similar case. Two regional courts tried to enforce debts at the expense of housing or, to be more exact, its part, to serve the claimants’ interests. But the decisions were later cancelled due to art. 446 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 

The Constitutional Court’s decision explains in detail that the proprietary rights of both a debtor and a creditor are similar by nature and, putting it simpler, balance and justice should be present in taking a decision.

Letting the constitutional right of a citizen pass unquestioned, the judges issued a pronouncement assigning the legislator to determine the immunity boundaries against collection.

Actually, the criterion of “the only suitable for living” housing, contained in the current edition of art. 446, has been proposed to be replaced by a complex structure including square meters, cost and social norms.

 

— What is the logic of the Justice Ministry’s proposals?

— There are cases, and there are many, when citizens having not repaid serious debts instead go bankrupt and stay living in a luxurious flat or cottage. And as the housing they stay in is the only one available to them, it cannot be collected. 

The Ministry’s bill draft makes it possible to withdraw such immunity with a number of restrictions, and it starts working when the housing area is twice as large as the social norms provided for all the members of the family, and the cost is twice as high as the social square metres they may be provided with.

 

— It seems to be reasonable…

— It is really difficult to argue against the logic but, as they say, it is very smooth on paper… A number of experts think that the proposed mechanism contains serious risks.

There are a number of problems connected with the housing evaluation in relation to the mentioned criteria. The comparison of the housing market cost with the cadaster evaluation of social square metres is very disputable, as it is evident that the market cost of any flat located in a good region of a city will be higher than the cadaster one.

Another group of problems is connected with the payment of a necessary sum of money for buying housing under social norms from the received competitive mass. A debtor is unlikely to buy housing in the same region – and this means there can be problems with work, school or nursery school for children, etc.

More than that, the cadaster evaluation institute on the whole gives rise to unfavourable criticism in Russia. Very often objects located near each other are evaluated differently. And this problem questions the bill draft’s implementation.

 

— Do you mean that the state is not ready for the implementation of such a bill draft?

— Yes, and it does not only refer to the evaluation system. Currently, the selling of property by auction is a “grey” area with many cases of scheming, twice or thrice tendering for price reduction, etc. There are quite a lot of people trying to catch fish in muddy water.  

And it is really dangerous to throw a debtor in for such a cynical slaughter; it won’t work. 

For a debtor to be provided with the right for housing a new competence is needed: a kind of state realtors’ institute, like state lawyers. The absence of housing manoeuvring funds all over the country makes the procedure of resettlement practically impossible. There is a big question concerning how the state will provide for the constitutional right to shelter. 

 

— How challenging is the problem of the population’s debts? The problems of several people may be solved in manual mode…and there’s nothing to discuss?

— Nothing has been done in the country for the five years since the CC’s decision was taken, but people have been making debts. Often, half criminal structures took part in crediting and re-crediting with great interest. Thus, small debts grew enormous, with the result of a total debt of over 1 trn roubles ($17 bln).

Taking into account the debts having been sold to collectors, the sum will surpass 1.5 trn roubles ($25 bln). This is more than 9m problematic loans. There are over 600,000 debtors in Russia close to bankruptcy.

In this situation, the introduction of a new regulation directed at the collection of the only housing means provoking serious social consequences.

 

— But the problem needs to be solved. Unless immunity is cancelled, a debtor turns out to be more privileged than a lender. What is to be done, from your point of view, at the state level to provide a fair balance?

— It is not punishment legislators should start with. Firstly, it is necessary to acquire the instruments for responsible crediting, meaning that financial institutions should be financially responsible for the credits surpassing the paying capacity of a citizen. The mechanism is to be worked out in 2017, according to President Putin’s charge.

Secondly, the mechanism of individuals’ bankruptcy is to be improved. At present, it is very conventional regarding people owning their only housing.  Until there is a real mechanism of bankruptcy of a person having got into complicated circumstances, it is too early to speak about collecting the only housing.  Often, financial problems occur when a person loses work, for example.

And, last but not the least, while discussing the introduction of such institutions one should understand that the novelty is to refer only to the debts made after the rules are changed.

 

Evgeny GORCHAKOV

Related publications

PARTNERS

UP