Go to mobile


11:48 27-04-2017
Slovenian investors set to build greenhouses, sports centers in Russia
10:58 27-04-2017
Huge Leroy Merlin store to be built in Russian city of Perm
10:40 27-04-2017
R-Pharm and Fujifilm to set up joint production of dietary supplements
10:19 27-04-2017
Xiaomi intends to open up to 20 new shops in Russian cities
09:53 27-04-2017
Gazprom considers gas production on shelf of Thailand and Cambodia
17:53 26-04-2017
Austrian authorities suspect Airbus CEO of $2-billion fraud
17:36 26-04-2017
Kamchatka’s priority development area to draw over $230m in investment
17:07 26-04-2017
NASA invents inflatable greenhouse for Mars and Moon
16:49 26-04-2017
Russian TVEL to supply fuel to Chinese companies for $1bn
16:29 26-04-2017
USA might start to export coal to Ukraine
16:16 26-04-2017
Gazprom plans to increase gas reserves by 469,9 bcm
16:01 26-04-2017
Construction of Eugal gas pipeline to begin next year
15:45 26-04-2017
Housing in Russia to become more expensive by 10-20%
15:06 26-04-2017
Japan studies Russian proposals to cooperate on Kuril Islands
14:53 26-04-2017
South Africa’s court cancels deal with Russia on NPP building
14:34 26-04-2017
Hungary to take part in Congress Hall construction for BRICS summit
13:41 26-04-2017
New entity for Islamic banking to be set up in Tatarstan
13:15 26-04-2017
Canada pledges to protect its domestic producers
12:57 26-04-2017
Rosnano to sign contract with Finns over wind farms building
11:24 26-04-2017
Russia reaches agreement with Boeing over Sea Launch program
10:33 26-04-2017
Russian escalator market might become world’s largest
09:42 26-04-2017
Chinese develop transport projects in Russian region of Leningrad
17:58 25-04-2017
Sales of new buildings in USA see 6% growth
17:49 25-04-2017
Moscow begins testing of Finnish electric bus of future
17:38 25-04-2017
Russia and Qatar consider joint projects worth $12 billion
17:07 25-04-2017
Why BIM technologies so popular in Finland
16:36 25-04-2017
French Minister pushes for sanctions against LafargeHolcim
16:03 25-04-2017
Russia plans to supply electricity to Ukraine’s breakaway region of Lugansk
15:47 25-04-2017
Chinese to build three metro stations in Moscow
14:33 25-04-2017
Tatarstan reduces cost of road construction, applying BIM technology
All news


«    April 2017    »

The new law on valuation smashes everything. What next?

logo russianconstruction.com
The new law on valuation smashes everything. What next?

New amendments to the law, “On the valuation activity on the Russian Federation” actually eliminate commercial evaluation activities in Russia.

From June 12, 2016 a law introducing significant changes into the process of evaluation activity has come into power. From the standpoint of the professional community, the innovations both break the activity model which has worked for so long and with such difficulty, and also offer additional opportunities for corruption, primarily during the privatization of state property.


A bolt from the blue

According to experts, the adoption of the new law was a bolt from the blue for the professional community. It was adopted hastily, without professional consultation and even by way of violation of prescribed procedures.

In the Federation Council, where it went after the State Duma, it was discussed for several minutes. The long debate was said to make no sense, as the amendments being introduced do not change the essence of the evaluation activity in the country in a fundamental way.

— But it is absolutely wrong, Irina Shevtsova, Director General of the NP SRO “Business Union of Evaluators”, is sure. — The thing is that the new law changes the character of the evaluation activity in a cardinal way, which overrides many of the most recent achievements. In fact, it eliminates SROs in the industry, turning them into a kind ofwaxwork. But it was the state that initiated the appearance of this institute, and now the state has demolished it!

Irina Shevtsova thinks that the evaluators have made significant efforts to increase the quality of their work, and these efforts were connected with the importance of SROs because they carried out expert assessments of the evaluators’ conclusions. The accuracy of their assessments was supported by the indemnification fund.

The principle of collective responsibility was implemented. If a member of a SRO did a bad job, the customer’s losses were taken care of by the indemnification fund. The mechanism was perceived as acceptable by the professional community.

In spite of all SRO members being responsible for somebody else’s mistakes, there was a general understanding of the necessity for such an approach. The SRO Expert Council acted as an upper chamber which assessed the correctness of the property evaluations.

And now this important function is being eliminated, and an expert examination not connected with SRO is being introduced.

According to Irina Shevtsova, a western model of expert examination of the evaluator’s conclusion has actually been introduced. In the West, such expert examination is carried out only upon the customer’s demand and has the status of professional advice but not an official expert assessment. The whole responsibility is assigned to the assessed property owner. The relations arising in the course of affairs are based not so much on legal but on moral and business categories.

The Russian system will be different. The report on the evaluation will be given the status of a legal document, and the evaluator is fully responsible for it.

Before the adoption of the new law, the evaluator could resort to a SRO in the instance of a disputed situation for the expert examination of his work to be carried out. The SRO’s indemnification fund was responsible for it, and repayments might reach 1m roubles.

The practice in its former form has now been wiped out. Expert examination may be done, but formerly a SRO did it for free - now the customer is to conclude a special agreement, which means additional expenditures.

Budget organization will become complicated, as the estimate of expenses does not include such service payments. Consequently, in the majority of cases there won’t be any additional expert examination, so the evaluation quality control mechanism will be gradually lost.

More than that, risks are growing sharply for such organizations.

— If there is no compulsory expert examination, there is no additional protection from the Prosecutor’s Office or Investigation Committee’s claims on the evaluation results, the Vice-President of the Russian Evaluators’ Society, Evgeny Neiman, explains. — And this is a wide-spread phenomenon in our practice, so be ready to be called to the competent authorities.

It will lead to one more negative consequence: the quality of inter-agency committees’ decisions on arguing the cadastral cost of objects will decrease, and if the case goes to court, they will be forced to carry out a new expert examination, at the claimant’s expense, of course.


Dead mechanism

Meanwhile, the results of expert examinations are the only tool for public control of state property evaluation. Thus, the evaluation procedure for state property privatization has become closed.

Specialists agree that the end of the expert examination of conclusions will lead to the non-transparency of deals and will enhance corruption in privatization procedures and other deals, including state property.

If the evaluation is formally carried out by a legal entity, and a particular employee is responsible for it, the mechanism of responsibility will not work, Elena Petrovskaya, chair of the industrial department for evaluation business of “Business Russia”, thinks.


Evaluators quit the market

Authorities seem to have chosen their way of breaking the self-regulation mechanism, and not only in construction. In the sphere of evaluation it worked rather efficiently. The mechanism developed by a process of evolution, undertaking important functions from the state. Now the reverse process has started: the state is depriving the evaluators’ SRO of one function after another.

Thus the Council for Evaluation Activity under the Ministry of Economic Development has started to deal with the development of professional standards, though all over the world this is the function of SRO.

Another important function – the professional activities and evaluators’ qualification level check – has also been taken away. Now they must take a state examination once every three years to legitimize their qualification. The new law has created conditions which make the creation of evaluators’ national associations impossible, Irina Shevtsova points out. All the requests from the professional community have been ignored. The Ministry of Economic Development has even adopted a code of evaluators’ professional honour. All over the world, it is the most important prerogative of the professional community.

And what is in the result? All the risks have grown sharply: the evaluators’, the customers’ and the state’s. There is now a tendency for professionals to quit the market, upon which it has become uninteresting and risky to work.


Nobody should get in the way

Presently, the market of evaluation activity is not in the best state: volumes are decreasing. If the state authorities keep on doing things this way, the market may fail, Alexei Kaminsky, President of the NP “Expert Council SRO” warns.

This is quite real. The attitude of the state towards this kind of business is very negative, and they are trying to force it out of the evaluation sphere. Instead, they are going to introduce cadastral evaluations carried out by state evaluators.

Actually, it will mean precisely this: an object will be evaluated the way the authorities want to evaluate it. This is the aim of the elimination of the institute of SRO: for nobody to stand in the way.

Vladimir GURVICH

Related publications