Go to mobile


16:54 28-04-2017
Austrian OMV to purchase additional volumes of gas from Gazprom
16:26 28-04-2017
Rosatom and Slovakia negotiate spent nuclear fuel reprocessing
15:54 28-04-2017
Monument to first President of Vietnam to be erected in Russia
15:35 28-04-2017
Californian scientists push for establishing bricks production on Mars
15:14 28-04-2017
Raven Russia buys from Finns two business centers in St. Petersburg
14:45 28-04-2017
Radiological center to be built in Moscow region
14:19 28-04-2017
Austria invites Putin to mark 50th anniversary of cooperation with Gazprom
13:50 28-04-2017
Russian scientists invent new heavy-duty polymer
13:25 28-04-2017
Son of Russian Prosecutor General to engage in construction in Crimea
12:28 28-04-2017
Russia ready to assist Japan in rebuilding Fukushima NPP, Putin says
12:14 28-04-2017
Hungary built second fence from migrants on Serbia’s border
11:25 28-04-2017
Gazprom to receive permits for Nord Stream 2 by mid-2018
11:03 28-04-2017
Investment in Yamal LNG project reached $23.4 bn
10:47 28-04-2017
Japanese might take part in preparation of Arctic LNG 2 project
10:18 28-04-2017
Russia allocates $1,4bn to support its manufacturing industry
09:59 28-04-2017
RDIF and JBIC determine mechanism of Russian-Japanese Investment Fund
09:41 28-04-2017
World’s largest shipyard to be completed in China soon
17:52 27-04-2017
Russian Rosnano and Finnish Fortum set up $530m wind power fund
17:32 27-04-2017
$2m motorway to be built in Russian city of Volgograd
17:08 27-04-2017
Start of Turkish Stream pipe laying scheduled for this summer
16:52 27-04-2017
$1,4m bridge across Don River to be erected in Russia
16:36 27-04-2017
Innovative medical cluster to be built in Russian North Caucasus
16:20 27-04-2017
Austrian building group Strabag increases its net profit by 55%
16:02 27-04-2017
“Branded” trains to be launched in Moscow region by 2018 World Cup
15:44 27-04-2017
Spaniards prepare reconstruction project for Russia-Georgia’s only road
15:22 27-04-2017
PGNiG files claim against Gazprom over antitrust law violation
14:46 27-04-2017
Chilean becomes first architect to win Gothenburg Prize
14:22 27-04-2017
Uber launches flying taxi by 2020
13:44 27-04-2017
Gazprom files €730m counter-claim against Italian Saipem
12:32 27-04-2017
China allocates over 6bn yuan to building e-vehicle factories
All news


«    April 2017    »

Cement certification: an end to counterfeiting or a token measure for business?

logo russianconstruction.com
Cement certification: an end to counterfeiting or a token measure for business?

Counterfeit products on the cement market, according to different sources, account for more than 50% of all sales. Will compulsory certification help to overcome the problem?


Since March 7th, 2016, according to the RF Government resolution №930, dated 03.09.2015, compulsory certification of cement has been in place. The meeting of the Technical Committee 465, which took place in the “Construction” SRC, was dedicated to the issue.  


The moderator of the event, the Deputy Minister of Construction, and the Chair of TC 465, Elena Sierra, remarked:

— Certification is targeted at the market obtaining quality products and being protected against counterfeits. Currently, according to different sources, counterfeit volumes are about 50%.

To bring discipline to this market segment, the government resolution was adopted. According to this, some types of cement are to pass compulsory certification. The resolution came to pass on March 7th

It should be noted that some experts spoke against the introduction of compulsory certification. According to them, it adds “mess” to business processes, as many producers cannot manage to get certificates on time.

And here is another reason against it:

— The introduction of certification is further grounds for somebody earning money, that’s all, the chief researcher of the Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Research Institute named after A.A. Gvozdev, Svetlana Podmazova, claimed.

— All over the world, compulsory certification has been introduced for products that may impact upon human health. Cement cannot do this, so I do not understand the reason for such a resolution being taken.

— Why has the compulsory certification of cement been introduced? asks the Head of the “Krost-D” laboratory, Evgeny Borisov. He cited the concrete certification system, which does not work, as an example.  

— Producers pay money to certifying institutions, but nobody checks anything seriously. But certifying institutions earn money from it.

—  “Mr. Director, the next stage has come: you are to pay 80,000—100,000 roubles for certification”, and “Mr. Director” pays the money. That’s the way it goes, Mr Borisov told us.  

According to him, the result would be different if all regulating and supervising authorities actually inspected the products and gave their conclusions.  

However, the Deputy Minister terminated the discussion on the pretext that the Government resolution is coming into operation, so there’s no use in discussing it.

The meeting’s participants came to a discussion of the National State Standards (GOSTs) certifying cement. Two GOSTs are in operation in Russia simultaneously: 10178-85 and 31108-2003. The latter is synchronized with European norms and regulations, but a number of enterprises keep working according to GOST 10178-85.

So, which GOST should be adhered to? Should both of them be followed or should GOST 10178-85 be cancelled?

— We’d like to receive expert opinion on the two GOSTs. They are to be compared, Elena Sierra said.

The experts’ opinions were different: some spoke for the immediate cancellation of the old GOST and the use of GOST 31108-2003, others spoke for a transition period of introduction (but not too long a period), as producers are to get gradually used to the new conditions.

Some experts spoke against the cancellation of GOST 10178-85.

Still others spoke for the creation of a new document integrating all the positive sides of the two GOSTs, such as Nickolai Rozental, the head of the laboratory at the Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Research Institute named after A.A. Gvozdev. So the meeting was highly emotional. We hope that its results will be useful. The TC 465 and the participants’ proposals will be summarized, analyzed and sent to the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (Rosstandart).

Gennady LULKIN




Some types of cement were included on the list of products for compulsory certification: portland cement, aluminate cement, slag cement, super-sulfate cement and hydraulic cements – colored, uncolored, readymade and clinker.


Principal differences between GOST 31108-2003 and GOST 10178-85:
* instead of cement types, strength grades have been introduced similar to those of EN 197-1;
* there are additional norms for strengths at the age of 2 days for cements of all strength grades besides those at the age of 28 days , excluding classes 22.5
Н and 32.5Н; and for cements of  22.5Н and 32.5Н class — the strength at the age of 7 days;
* for all strength grades, except 22.5, the cements are divided according to their  rate-of-hardening parameters into regular hardening and fast hardening ones, which allows one to minimize cement consumption in the course of construction due to its optimal selection as to its hardening performance.

Related publications