Go to mobile


16:56 23-06-2017
Cabinet of Ministers allotted land plot for construction runway-3 in Sheremetievo
16:31 23-06-2017
KamAZ to invest €50 m to production in Senegal
14:46 23-06-2017
Lukoil won a tender on supply of 2,700 tons of oil to Severstal enterprises
14:17 23-06-2017
President Putin to control pipeline mating at the Turkish Stream construction
13:37 23-06-2017
Reconstruction of Moscow conservatoire to be completed
13:26 23-06-2017
Thrill rides to be built in Moscow Luzhniki
12:54 23-06-2017
Unique green roofing to be built in Moscow during renovation
12:32 23-06-2017
The Chinese participating in Moscow Metro construction
11:16 23-06-2017
Grand fraud discovered at a business centre construction site in Krasnoyarsk
18:02 22-06-2017
Rostec to restore enterprise producing acoustic equipment
17:50 22-06-2017
Seven plants to open in Dubna special economic zone
17:35 22-06-2017
Putin heads for Anapa to control Turkish Stream pipeline link-up
17:12 22-06-2017
Heineken sells its brew-house in Belarus
16:53 22-06-2017
Tesla signs preliminary agreement on plant building in China
16:35 22-06-2017
Industrial warehouse in northern Moscow put on auction for $751,000
16:02 22-06-2017
China suggests project for Changchun – Vladivostok high-speed railway
15:33 22-06-2017
Europe’s gas demand exceeds Nord Stream 2 capacity, Wintershall says
14:56 22-06-2017
Poland to demolish 500 monuments to Soviet soldiers
14:33 22-06-2017
President Putin orders to close notorious landfill in Balashikha
12:22 22-06-2017
Gazprom estimates Turkish Stream project at $6 billion
11:56 22-06-2017
Japanese NEDO to implement renewable energy project in Yakutia
11:45 22-06-2017
Russian Railway gets $157 million for development of Moscow railroad
11:14 22-06-2017
Huge Lenta hypermarket to be erected in Naberezhnye Chelny
10:58 22-06-2017
Australian sheep farm to be built in Russia for $334 million
09:45 22-06-2017
European operators start extension of gas pipelines for Nord Stream 2
17:57 21-06-2017
Israel's largest Gottesman oceanarium to open in July
17:42 21-06-2017
Egypt’s court suspends transfer of islands to Saudi Arabia
17:21 21-06-2017
Russia to supply three Be-200 amphibious aircrafts to Argentina
16:54 21-06-2017
Rolls-Royce to supply engines for Russian-Chinese wide-body aircraft
16:38 21-06-2017
Wintershall likely to collaborate with Gazprom in Iran
All news


«    June 2017    »

Cement certification: an end to counterfeiting or a token measure for business?

logo russianconstruction.com
Cement certification: an end to counterfeiting or a token measure for business?

Counterfeit products on the cement market, according to different sources, account for more than 50% of all sales. Will compulsory certification help to overcome the problem?


Since March 7th, 2016, according to the RF Government resolution №930, dated 03.09.2015, compulsory certification of cement has been in place. The meeting of the Technical Committee 465, which took place in the “Construction” SRC, was dedicated to the issue.  


The moderator of the event, the Deputy Minister of Construction, and the Chair of TC 465, Elena Sierra, remarked:

— Certification is targeted at the market obtaining quality products and being protected against counterfeits. Currently, according to different sources, counterfeit volumes are about 50%.

To bring discipline to this market segment, the government resolution was adopted. According to this, some types of cement are to pass compulsory certification. The resolution came to pass on March 7th

It should be noted that some experts spoke against the introduction of compulsory certification. According to them, it adds “mess” to business processes, as many producers cannot manage to get certificates on time.

And here is another reason against it:

— The introduction of certification is further grounds for somebody earning money, that’s all, the chief researcher of the Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Research Institute named after A.A. Gvozdev, Svetlana Podmazova, claimed.

— All over the world, compulsory certification has been introduced for products that may impact upon human health. Cement cannot do this, so I do not understand the reason for such a resolution being taken.

— Why has the compulsory certification of cement been introduced? asks the Head of the “Krost-D” laboratory, Evgeny Borisov. He cited the concrete certification system, which does not work, as an example.  

— Producers pay money to certifying institutions, but nobody checks anything seriously. But certifying institutions earn money from it.

—  “Mr. Director, the next stage has come: you are to pay 80,000—100,000 roubles for certification”, and “Mr. Director” pays the money. That’s the way it goes, Mr Borisov told us.  

According to him, the result would be different if all regulating and supervising authorities actually inspected the products and gave their conclusions.  

However, the Deputy Minister terminated the discussion on the pretext that the Government resolution is coming into operation, so there’s no use in discussing it.

The meeting’s participants came to a discussion of the National State Standards (GOSTs) certifying cement. Two GOSTs are in operation in Russia simultaneously: 10178-85 and 31108-2003. The latter is synchronized with European norms and regulations, but a number of enterprises keep working according to GOST 10178-85.

So, which GOST should be adhered to? Should both of them be followed or should GOST 10178-85 be cancelled?

— We’d like to receive expert opinion on the two GOSTs. They are to be compared, Elena Sierra said.

The experts’ opinions were different: some spoke for the immediate cancellation of the old GOST and the use of GOST 31108-2003, others spoke for a transition period of introduction (but not too long a period), as producers are to get gradually used to the new conditions.

Some experts spoke against the cancellation of GOST 10178-85.

Still others spoke for the creation of a new document integrating all the positive sides of the two GOSTs, such as Nickolai Rozental, the head of the laboratory at the Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Research Institute named after A.A. Gvozdev. So the meeting was highly emotional. We hope that its results will be useful. The TC 465 and the participants’ proposals will be summarized, analyzed and sent to the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (Rosstandart).

Gennady LULKIN




Some types of cement were included on the list of products for compulsory certification: portland cement, aluminate cement, slag cement, super-sulfate cement and hydraulic cements – colored, uncolored, readymade and clinker.


Principal differences between GOST 31108-2003 and GOST 10178-85:
* instead of cement types, strength grades have been introduced similar to those of EN 197-1;
* there are additional norms for strengths at the age of 2 days for cements of all strength grades besides those at the age of 28 days , excluding classes 22.5
Н and 32.5Н; and for cements of  22.5Н and 32.5Н class — the strength at the age of 7 days;
* for all strength grades, except 22.5, the cements are divided according to their  rate-of-hardening parameters into regular hardening and fast hardening ones, which allows one to minimize cement consumption in the course of construction due to its optimal selection as to its hardening performance.

Related publications