Go to mobile


22:54 24-03-2017
Japan notes steady progress in implementation of cooperation plan with Russia
22:19 24-03-2017
Argentinean Tecpetrol to invest $2.3 billion in Vaca Muerta shale deposits
21:56 24-03-2017
Russia and Israel agree on flights from Zhukovsky airport
21:23 24-03-2017
Thai CP Group sets to build mega-farm in Russia
21:02 24-03-2017
Ryazan region allocates $47 million for roads repair and maintenance
20:30 24-03-2017
Russia and its Chinese partners set up two $1bn funds for Far East development
19:51 24-03-2017
Moscow puts on auction premises in Samsonov mansion on Prechistenka
17:45 24-03-2017
Gazprom invests $146m in Astrakhan region’s projects
16:44 24-03-2017
Saint-Gobain supplies riffled glass developed for greenhouses
16:27 24-03-2017
State Department approves pipeline construction in Montana
16:03 24-03-2017
$8,6m pavilion for pandas to be built in Moscow zoo
15:21 24-03-2017
Foton launches sales of Sauvana SUV in Russia
14:15 24-03-2017
Unmanned subway trains to be launched in China this year
13:20 24-03-2017
Russia allocates $2 billion to major construction of military facilities
12:57 24-03-2017
Top managers’ salaries in Russian state corporations to be tied to performance indicator
12:18 24-03-2017
Modern Skating Center to be erected in Russian city of Tula
11:59 24-03-2017
Crimea to be built up with resort industry-based towns
11:08 24-03-2017
Russia opens unique $2m waste recycling plant above Arctic Circle
10:29 24-03-2017
Mountain in Altai region named in honour of Gazprom
09:40 24-03-2017
Ex-Finance Minister of Ukraine to restore Puerto Rico’s financial stability
21:21 23-03-2017
Russia builds plant producing drugs based on human blood plasma
20:55 23-03-2017
Finnish company to build 28,000 sqm of housing in Moscow region
20:43 23-03-2017
Cheapest apartment in historical center of Moscow put for sale for $86,5m
20:23 23-03-2017
Architect offers to use experience of ancient Russian towns to develop territory
19:54 23-03-2017
Russian Railways to allocate extra funds for construction of Krasnodar bypass
19:38 23-03-2017
German scientists put in operation artificial sun
19:16 23-03-2017
Foreign scientists gather in Moscow to simulate interplanetary flights
18:44 23-03-2017
Chinese Bank starts to carry out operations in yuan in Russia
18:01 23-03-2017
Russia establishes Council for Antiseismic Construction
17:37 23-03-2017
Duterte welcomes Russian warships in ports of Philippines
All news


«    March 2017    »

Cement certification: an end to counterfeiting or a token measure for business?

logo russianconstruction.com
Cement certification: an end to counterfeiting or a token measure for business?

Counterfeit products on the cement market, according to different sources, account for more than 50% of all sales. Will compulsory certification help to overcome the problem?


Since March 7th, 2016, according to the RF Government resolution №930, dated 03.09.2015, compulsory certification of cement has been in place. The meeting of the Technical Committee 465, which took place in the “Construction” SRC, was dedicated to the issue.  


The moderator of the event, the Deputy Minister of Construction, and the Chair of TC 465, Elena Sierra, remarked:

— Certification is targeted at the market obtaining quality products and being protected against counterfeits. Currently, according to different sources, counterfeit volumes are about 50%.

To bring discipline to this market segment, the government resolution was adopted. According to this, some types of cement are to pass compulsory certification. The resolution came to pass on March 7th

It should be noted that some experts spoke against the introduction of compulsory certification. According to them, it adds “mess” to business processes, as many producers cannot manage to get certificates on time.

And here is another reason against it:

— The introduction of certification is further grounds for somebody earning money, that’s all, the chief researcher of the Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Research Institute named after A.A. Gvozdev, Svetlana Podmazova, claimed.

— All over the world, compulsory certification has been introduced for products that may impact upon human health. Cement cannot do this, so I do not understand the reason for such a resolution being taken.

— Why has the compulsory certification of cement been introduced? asks the Head of the “Krost-D” laboratory, Evgeny Borisov. He cited the concrete certification system, which does not work, as an example.  

— Producers pay money to certifying institutions, but nobody checks anything seriously. But certifying institutions earn money from it.

—  “Mr. Director, the next stage has come: you are to pay 80,000—100,000 roubles for certification”, and “Mr. Director” pays the money. That’s the way it goes, Mr Borisov told us.  

According to him, the result would be different if all regulating and supervising authorities actually inspected the products and gave their conclusions.  

However, the Deputy Minister terminated the discussion on the pretext that the Government resolution is coming into operation, so there’s no use in discussing it.

The meeting’s participants came to a discussion of the National State Standards (GOSTs) certifying cement. Two GOSTs are in operation in Russia simultaneously: 10178-85 and 31108-2003. The latter is synchronized with European norms and regulations, but a number of enterprises keep working according to GOST 10178-85.

So, which GOST should be adhered to? Should both of them be followed or should GOST 10178-85 be cancelled?

— We’d like to receive expert opinion on the two GOSTs. They are to be compared, Elena Sierra said.

The experts’ opinions were different: some spoke for the immediate cancellation of the old GOST and the use of GOST 31108-2003, others spoke for a transition period of introduction (but not too long a period), as producers are to get gradually used to the new conditions.

Some experts spoke against the cancellation of GOST 10178-85.

Still others spoke for the creation of a new document integrating all the positive sides of the two GOSTs, such as Nickolai Rozental, the head of the laboratory at the Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Research Institute named after A.A. Gvozdev. So the meeting was highly emotional. We hope that its results will be useful. The TC 465 and the participants’ proposals will be summarized, analyzed and sent to the Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (Rosstandart).

Gennady LULKIN




Some types of cement were included on the list of products for compulsory certification: portland cement, aluminate cement, slag cement, super-sulfate cement and hydraulic cements – colored, uncolored, readymade and clinker.


Principal differences between GOST 31108-2003 and GOST 10178-85:
* instead of cement types, strength grades have been introduced similar to those of EN 197-1;
* there are additional norms for strengths at the age of 2 days for cements of all strength grades besides those at the age of 28 days , excluding classes 22.5
Н and 32.5Н; and for cements of  22.5Н and 32.5Н class — the strength at the age of 7 days;
* for all strength grades, except 22.5, the cements are divided according to their  rate-of-hardening parameters into regular hardening and fast hardening ones, which allows one to minimize cement consumption in the course of construction due to its optimal selection as to its hardening performance.

Related publications