Go to mobile


10:38 23-05-2017
Steven Seagal to receive free land in Russia via TV show
09:58 23-05-2017
Volume of housing construction in Russia dropped by 15% this year
17:44 22-05-2017
Volkswagen and Chinese JAC Motor set up joint e-vehicles plant
17:17 22-05-2017
Nobody wants to build sea terminal for $15m in Kaliningrad region
16:58 22-05-2017
Modern Olympic Center to be erected in Russian North Caucasus
16:40 22-05-2017
First wind farm to be built in Kaliningrad region
16:24 22-05-2017
Russian Defense Ministry plans large-scale construction in Crimea
15:57 22-05-2017
Agreement establishing Russian-Turkish Investment Fund to be signed
15:45 22-05-2017
Primorye to provide guarantees for completion of Hyatt hotel
15:31 22-05-2017
6-hectare plot of land in Yekaterinburg put on auction
15:15 22-05-2017
Wonderful 17th-century stone bridge discovered in Moscow
14:58 22-05-2017
$2-million four-lane road needs to be constructed in Volgograd
14:39 22-05-2017
30-hectare low-rise micro-district to be built in Moscow region
14:20 22-05-2017
Third of new houses in Russia to be built from wood
13:48 22-05-2017
Sika building company’s CEO becomes head of LafargeHolcim
12:57 22-05-2017
Chinese CRIG to build fourth metro line in Kyiv
12:00 22-05-2017
Modern hotel for guests of New Jerusalem to be erected in Moscow region
11:45 22-05-2017
Italian Pizzarotti to build two health care facilities in Russia
10:47 22-05-2017
Swiss citizens vote against construction of new NPPs
09:51 22-05-2017
Saudi Arabia, UAE invest $100m in Ivanka Trump’s Fund
17:54 19-05-2017
Spanish Bustren to develop documents for Second Metro Ring in Moscow
17:38 19-05-2017
Radisson Blue hotel in Olympic Sochi put up for sale
17:19 19-05-2017
Italians set to invest in Russia’s cheese cluster worth $52 million
16:55 19-05-2017
Gas hydrate extraction in China not to affect Power of Siberia – Gazprom
16:35 19-05-2017
$12m allocated to build airport terminal in Russian city of Saransk
16:23 19-05-2017
Project for Russian industrial zone in Egypt likely to fail, expert says
15:59 19-05-2017
Construction of integrated tractor plant launched in Russia
15:48 19-05-2017
Builders install 500kg bench overlooking Kerch Bridge construction site
15:23 19-05-2017
Construction Minister attends opening of new waste sorting plant
14:49 19-05-2017
Russian Foreign Economic Affairs Bank opens offices in Abu Dhabi and Bahrain
All news


«    May 2017    »

Moscow construction complex – 2017: not all developers will survive

logo russianconstruction.com
Moscow construction complex – 2017: not all developers will survive

How the amendments to 214-FL will impact the work of the capital’s developers

Moscow authorities are going to tighten the grip on companies attracting citizens’ finances for housing construction. Moscow Deputy Mayor for urban development policy and construction, Marat Khusnullin, spoke about it at the “Dialogue with an investor” seminar.

According to him, the number of hoodwinked investors has reached 1060 people. Last year they totalled 676. The capital’s authorities cannot explain why this unfortunate index has grown by almost 57%, but they remark that it is inadmissible to damage citizens’ confidence. 

The numbers of co-investment agreement and hoodwinked investors are growing

In March, 2016, Marat Khusnullin made optimistic forecasts claiming that the number of cheated investors would not grow. He remarked that not all companies fit into the preplanned terms, although despite this they are concluding the construction of their objects.

In May, Head of Moskomstroyinvest, Konstantin Timofeev, at a city government sitting remarked that 676 people had been added to the list of people having suffered from unscrupulous developers. As such, the number has now grown to 1060 hoodwinked investors.

According to Konstantin Timofeev, there are 6 unfinished constructions by the notorious CU-155 company. The most problematic objects are situated in Scherbinka at Balaklavsky Avenue and in Bochkov Street.

At the same time, despite the economy present condition, Muskovites continue investing their money in joint-funded construction work. The total volume of the attracted financing under the existing co-investment agreements amounts to 700 bln roubles ($11.34 bln), and since the beginning of 2016  318 bln roubles ($5.15 bln) have been invested in new buildings in Moscow.

Moscow authorities have stressed more than once that the population is the main investor in housing construction, and the number of the concluded co-investment agreements grows annually. Thus, more than 1.6 trn roubles ($25.9 bln) have been invested in joint-funded construction during the last 6 years.

It is a huge sum of money, isn’t it? “16 Moscow Central Ring Roads might be built for this money”, Konstantin Timofeev remarks.

Legal vacuum

It is not surprising that, as Marat Khusnullin puts it, the authorities are interested in strictly following all the norms and regulations of 214-FL. The Vice-Mayor stressed that Moscow’s government intends to control this sphere firmly, despite the fact that, “Some developers do not like it”. 

Following him, it is inadmissible to damage citizen’s confidence in this issue as the population finances 70% of the objects’ construction cost.

“Can we reject 800 bln interest-free roubles a year?” he asks a rhetorical question and answers, “Of course, not! And we shall do everything for this money to stay in the industry. And I’ll ask the developers to switch over to 214-FL with minimal losses.”

As Marat Khusnullin said, some criminal cases have been initiated due to violations of the law..

In his turn, Konstantin Timofeev complained that until the end of the year, construction companies will stay in a “legal vacuum”. But he expressed his hope that the amendments to 214-FL, declined by the RF Minisrty of Finance and the Ministry of Justice, will have been adopted before the end of 2016, making it then much simpler for developers to work.

Moscow construction complex – 2017: not all developers will survive

You have not been inspected yet? We are coming!

One of the measures to secure co-investors is via initiating inspections by Moskomstroyinvest. For 6 years, the institution has organized 770 such events (including 308 preplanned, 392 unscheduled, and 70 together with law-enforcement agencies). The number of checks has increased 5-fold when compared with the previous year. 

In 2017, half of the Moscow companies attracting the population’s money may avoid such inspections. This is connected with their status as “small business” enterprises (almost 50%), and President Putin has more than once forbidden the idea of demonising small businesses.  Nevertheless, Moskomstroyinvest intends to conduct non-scheduled inspections of citizens’ and law-enforcement agencies’ resorts. 

Another criterion to judge a developer’s reliability is the increase of a company’s authorised capital.

— It is a delicate issue. But, in our opinion, anyone who needs public funding should satisfy the legal requirements, the head of Moskomstroyinvest announced, addressing the developers, before reminding that the authorized capital is the company’s own money, which is there to cover the risk they bear. 

To remind you, the deadline for bringing the authorised capital to correspondence is July 1st, 2017.

Timofeev also added that at present 24 companies in Moscow are violating the norms of financial stability, including the norms concerning the designated use of funds, with large market players among them.

It is too early to judge yet if the amendments to the law regulating housing construction at the expense of the population’s money will turn positive or negative.

On the one hand, the appearance of such a document is the reply to the current reality. Construction companies should have become more open long ago, and the market should be devoid of unconscientious players. 

On the other hand, some amendments have not been elaborated properly, and introducing “raw” regulations may deal a blow to the construction industry on the whole.

Not all developers may survive such a shock, especially with regard to small and young companies. In this case developers will ask the State for help again, which will create an additional burden for the budget. 


Related publications