Enes
Moscow
WINNER OF THE RF MINSTROY MEDIA COMPETITION 2016
Go to mobile

LATEST NEWS

22:51 29-03-2017
Russian scientists created material ensuring 30 years of reactor’s operation
22:26 29-03-2017
Russia initiates criminal case over ex-lawmaker Voronenkov’s murder — media
22:01 29-03-2017
India's ONGC may join development of Dolginskoye oil field in Russia
21:37 29-03-2017
Gazprom offers its satellite systems at laying of Northern sea route
21:15 29-03-2017
Helicopters of Russia supply first multi-purpose helicopter to Kenya
20:21 29-03-2017
Large apartment complex to be erected in Voronezh for $17,5m
18:28 29-03-2017
Russia urges to consider Hyperloop project in Arctic transport development
17:32 29-03-2017
Russian Minister determines investment potential in Arctic energy sector
16:58 29-03-2017
London court hands down first decision on $3bn Ukraine’s debt to Russia
16:24 29-03-2017
Russia and Iran agree on cooperation in construction and housing
15:45 29-03-2017
Germans show interest in resort real estate of Crimea
15:02 29-03-2017
American architects propose skyscraper hanging suspended from asteroid
14:44 29-03-2017
Paris declines services of LafargeHolcim due to cement supplies for Trump Wall
13:52 29-03-2017
Gold deposits of 550 tons discovered in China
13:33 29-03-2017
Lukoil CEO discuss joint projects with Iranian Oil Minister
12:21 29-03-2017
First power unit of Iran's Bushehr NPP reaches its design capacity — Putin
11:49 29-03-2017
Bridge across Amur River spanning Russian and Chinese coasts to be erected in 2018
11:16 29-03-2017
High-capacity gold mining plant to be built in Uzbekistan
10:48 29-03-2017
Westinghouse energy company starts bankruptcy procedure
09:33 29-03-2017
Top official in Russian Culture Ministry detained by FSB in fraud case
21:03 28-03-2017
Putin and Rouhani consider supplies of SSJ100 to Iran
20:45 28-03-2017
Housing prices in USA grow faster than inflation and wages
19:44 28-03-2017
New shelter for homeless animals needs to be built in Perm
19:08 28-03-2017
Major broiler breeding facility to be erected in Moscow region
18:55 28-03-2017
Famous boxer to build large sports complex in Chelyabinsk
18:38 28-03-2017
Construction of high-tech shipyard starts in Russian city near Arctic Circle
17:39 28-03-2017
FSB conducts anti-terror training exercise on Kerch Bridge
16:23 28-03-2017
Chinese to build smart greenhouses in Russian city of Ulan-Ude
15:30 28-03-2017
South Korea stops NPP reactor due to risk of nuclear seepage
14:02 28-03-2017
Hotel market boom expected in Moscow by 2018 World Cup
All news

ARCHIVE NEWS

«    March 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Moscow construction complex – 2017: not all developers will survive

logo russianconstruction.com
Moscow construction complex – 2017: not all developers will survive

How the amendments to 214-FL will impact the work of the capital’s developers

Moscow authorities are going to tighten the grip on companies attracting citizens’ finances for housing construction. Moscow Deputy Mayor for urban development policy and construction, Marat Khusnullin, spoke about it at the “Dialogue with an investor” seminar.

According to him, the number of hoodwinked investors has reached 1060 people. Last year they totalled 676. The capital’s authorities cannot explain why this unfortunate index has grown by almost 57%, but they remark that it is inadmissible to damage citizens’ confidence. 

The numbers of co-investment agreement and hoodwinked investors are growing

In March, 2016, Marat Khusnullin made optimistic forecasts claiming that the number of cheated investors would not grow. He remarked that not all companies fit into the preplanned terms, although despite this they are concluding the construction of their objects.

In May, Head of Moskomstroyinvest, Konstantin Timofeev, at a city government sitting remarked that 676 people had been added to the list of people having suffered from unscrupulous developers. As such, the number has now grown to 1060 hoodwinked investors.

According to Konstantin Timofeev, there are 6 unfinished constructions by the notorious CU-155 company. The most problematic objects are situated in Scherbinka at Balaklavsky Avenue and in Bochkov Street.

At the same time, despite the economy present condition, Muskovites continue investing their money in joint-funded construction work. The total volume of the attracted financing under the existing co-investment agreements amounts to 700 bln roubles ($11.34 bln), and since the beginning of 2016  318 bln roubles ($5.15 bln) have been invested in new buildings in Moscow.

Moscow authorities have stressed more than once that the population is the main investor in housing construction, and the number of the concluded co-investment agreements grows annually. Thus, more than 1.6 trn roubles ($25.9 bln) have been invested in joint-funded construction during the last 6 years.

It is a huge sum of money, isn’t it? “16 Moscow Central Ring Roads might be built for this money”, Konstantin Timofeev remarks.

Legal vacuum

It is not surprising that, as Marat Khusnullin puts it, the authorities are interested in strictly following all the norms and regulations of 214-FL. The Vice-Mayor stressed that Moscow’s government intends to control this sphere firmly, despite the fact that, “Some developers do not like it”. 

Following him, it is inadmissible to damage citizen’s confidence in this issue as the population finances 70% of the objects’ construction cost.

“Can we reject 800 bln interest-free roubles a year?” he asks a rhetorical question and answers, “Of course, not! And we shall do everything for this money to stay in the industry. And I’ll ask the developers to switch over to 214-FL with minimal losses.”

As Marat Khusnullin said, some criminal cases have been initiated due to violations of the law..

In his turn, Konstantin Timofeev complained that until the end of the year, construction companies will stay in a “legal vacuum”. But he expressed his hope that the amendments to 214-FL, declined by the RF Minisrty of Finance and the Ministry of Justice, will have been adopted before the end of 2016, making it then much simpler for developers to work.

Moscow construction complex – 2017: not all developers will survive

You have not been inspected yet? We are coming!

One of the measures to secure co-investors is via initiating inspections by Moskomstroyinvest. For 6 years, the institution has organized 770 such events (including 308 preplanned, 392 unscheduled, and 70 together with law-enforcement agencies). The number of checks has increased 5-fold when compared with the previous year. 

In 2017, half of the Moscow companies attracting the population’s money may avoid such inspections. This is connected with their status as “small business” enterprises (almost 50%), and President Putin has more than once forbidden the idea of demonising small businesses.  Nevertheless, Moskomstroyinvest intends to conduct non-scheduled inspections of citizens’ and law-enforcement agencies’ resorts. 

Another criterion to judge a developer’s reliability is the increase of a company’s authorised capital.

— It is a delicate issue. But, in our opinion, anyone who needs public funding should satisfy the legal requirements, the head of Moskomstroyinvest announced, addressing the developers, before reminding that the authorized capital is the company’s own money, which is there to cover the risk they bear. 

To remind you, the deadline for bringing the authorised capital to correspondence is July 1st, 2017.

Timofeev also added that at present 24 companies in Moscow are violating the norms of financial stability, including the norms concerning the designated use of funds, with large market players among them.

It is too early to judge yet if the amendments to the law regulating housing construction at the expense of the population’s money will turn positive or negative.

On the one hand, the appearance of such a document is the reply to the current reality. Construction companies should have become more open long ago, and the market should be devoid of unconscientious players. 

On the other hand, some amendments have not been elaborated properly, and introducing “raw” regulations may deal a blow to the construction industry on the whole.

Not all developers may survive such a shock, especially with regard to small and young companies. In this case developers will ask the State for help again, which will create an additional burden for the budget. 

Yulia YUDINA

Related publications

PARTNERS

UP