Enes
Moscow
WINNER OF THE RF MINSTROY MEDIA COMPETITION 2016
Go to mobile

LATEST NEWS

17:53 26-04-2017
Austrian authorities suspect Airbus CEO of $2-billion fraud
17:36 26-04-2017
Kamchatka’s priority development area to draw over $230m in investment
17:07 26-04-2017
NASA invents inflatable greenhouse for Mars and Moon
16:49 26-04-2017
Russian TVEL to supply fuel to Chinese companies for $1bn
16:29 26-04-2017
USA and Ukraine discuss coal supplies
16:16 26-04-2017
Gazprom plans to increase gas reserves by 469,9 bcm
16:01 26-04-2017
Construction of Eugal gas pipeline to begin next year
15:45 26-04-2017
Housing in Russia to become more expensive by 10-20%
15:06 26-04-2017
Japan studies Russian proposals to cooperate on Kuril Islands
14:53 26-04-2017
South Africa’s court cancels deal with Russia on NPP building
14:34 26-04-2017
Hungary to take part in Congress Hall construction for BRICS summit
13:41 26-04-2017
New entity for Islamic banking to be set up in Tatarstan
13:15 26-04-2017
Canada pledges to protect its domestic producers
12:57 26-04-2017
Rosnano to sign contract with Finns over wind farms building
11:24 26-04-2017
Russia reaches agreement with Boeing over Sea Launch program
10:33 26-04-2017
Russian escalator market might become world’s largest
09:42 26-04-2017
Chinese develop transport projects in Russian region of Leningrad
17:58 25-04-2017
Sales of new buildings in USA see 6% growth
17:49 25-04-2017
Moscow begins testing of Finnish electric bus of future
17:38 25-04-2017
Russia and Qatar consider joint projects worth $12 billion
17:07 25-04-2017
Why BIM technologies so popular in Finland
16:36 25-04-2017
French Minister pushes for sanctions against LafargeHolcim
16:03 25-04-2017
Russia plans to supply electricity to Ukraine’s breakaway region of Lugansk
15:47 25-04-2017
Chinese to build three metro stations in Moscow
14:33 25-04-2017
Tatarstan reduces cost of road construction, applying BIM technology
14:16 25-04-2017
Moscow chief architect unveils prospects of wooden housing construction
14:06 25-04-2017
Russian PM demands that regions carry out quality repair of roads
12:28 25-04-2017
Rostec weapons cluster to be expanded with 70 enterprises
12:07 25-04-2017
Land plot of Heineken plant in Kaliningrad put on auction
11:44 25-04-2017
EU urges to speed up Rail Baltic project implementation
All news

ARCHIVE NEWS

«    April 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

The 'Venice: may we be proud of architectural masterpieces of the Stalin repressions epoch?

logo russianconstruction.com
The 'Venice: may we be proud of architectural masterpieces of the Stalin repressions epoch?

Experts considered the choice of the focus for the Russian pavilion at the ‘Venice controversial. Why so?

This year Russia brought the «V.D.N.H. Urban Phenomenon» project dedicated to  the important for the Russians territory – Exhibition of Economic Achievements (VDNKh) to the architectural biennale in Venice. Hardly had the biennale opened when the discussion started in the Internet, why this project? The topic was immediately defined as controversial. Is it really so?

Unique monument or Stalinism’s hangover?

VDNKh is often represented as a symbol of Stalinism, of Potemkinism, happy Kuban Cossacks who had never been so much happy. Is it really necessary to revive this symbol, and if so – then how should it be done?

Some people were sure that the VDNKh has nothing to do with the announced theme of the festival - «Battle line broadcast», focused on social problems. It was proposed by Alejandro Aravena, Chilean architect, Pritzker Prize laureate.

Meanwhile, the Russian pavilion managers in Venice think that the choice was right. VDNKh – is a unique monument of the Soviet period which needs preservation, care and considerate use.  

 

«Unmerciful time but architecture is not at fault»

The argument on this issue continued within the discussion “Russian pavilion at the’Venice-2016: pro и contra».

Experts gathered in the library named after F. Dostoevsky on Chistye Prudy: Sergei Kuznetsov, the pavilion manager, Chief architect of Moscow; Grigory Revzin, architectural critic; Alexei Novikov, Dean of Higher School of Urban Planning; Yuliy Borisov, Head of architecture bureau; experts, journalists, guests. Operating Director of the Higher School of Urban Planning, Vera Leonova was the discussion moderator.

So, is the symbol to be revived? And is it to the point at the international architectural exhibition? May it be an attempt to avoid sharp social problems of the modern world?

Sergei Kuznetsov stood in the breach.

— Avoidance? I do not agree, — he said sharply and explained: — We have the heritage of difficult time: some people think it the best time in their lives, others call it monstrous. Nevertheless, in Stalin period unique objects were erected which are to be preserved.

According to Sergei Kuznetsov, VDNKh is a really social project. An attempt has been made to turn the monument of the past into a modern public space, comfortable for everybody, to breathe new life into it.

— And here we align with the biennale’s topic, he stressed. — Architects received a very interesting task in this context. Now the architect’s profession is quite different from the one it used to be. Today an architect’s task is not just to design a building but to develop the environment.  

Sleeping empire, but it may wake up

…Within biennale a film by student Lina Dudareva was shown: half-destroyed pavilions of the exhibition covered with a film. The broken buildings are the symbol of the empire which is sleeping but may wake up any time.

— One should remember that the time when the exhibition itself was created was the black time of the Russian history: the period of collectivization and repressions, — the architecture historian and publisher Marina Khrustaleva reminded those present (from California via Skype). —VDNKh is known to have been built by prisoners, and the chief architect of the exhibition, Viacheslav Oltarzhevsky was imprisoned.

— The painful for all of us theme seems to have been ignored in the project presented, — Marina Khrustaleva continued. — The events of those years should have been reflected (as a kind of repentance in artistic form) and then present the new VDNKh. The Russian pavilion has not revealed the theme in full. Thus, the exposition of 2016 is a well-made ideological project, that everything is wonderful. However, from the historian’s standpoint, the approach is too simple.

 

Bloodthirsty regimes sometimes had great architecture

There is a problem of work with undesirable heritage – and VDNKh is just the case. But people managed. 

— Yes, the architecture was created in the time of bloodthirsty regime, — Sergei Kuznetsov did not argue. — But let us remember how many objects of great architecture were created by bloodthirsty regimes, and it does not derogate its artistic values. Yes, there were persons deprived of liberty and political prisoners. But there was great Vuchetich who created wonderful statues decorating VDNKh even now, there was Prokofiev, who wrote music for the exhibition. And they did great things! It must be preserved!  

So, where is our front line?

— It is in our minds, — Yuly Borisov, the author of one of the newest VDNKh pavilions – the Rosatom pavilion. — We are struggling against our own demons...

Too imperial, isnt it?

The pompous and even imperial look of the Russian pavilion was noted by many. In this regard, Russia gets out of the general background as other countries prepared rather modest pavilions. The exhibition, as you remember, is dedicated to the architecture solving social problems. Such as, for example, the project by Alejandro Aravena, the biennale supervisor, who invented the ½ formula (the problem of housing provision of the poorest people is solved originally: his architecture bureau builds half a house for free, and the other part is built by the owner of the house).

And the Russian pavilion with its giant Worker and Farmer statue, women with sheaves, tractor drivers – and all these, made of bronze, in the best traditions of socialist realism, move on huge screens. 

— I have been decorating the Russian pavilion for many years, — architectural critic, Grigory Revzin, speaks. — And we have always been blamed of something, so we are accustomed to criticism.  

  • Why should we make pavilions about refugees, or floating schools in Africa? We have our own problems. And I think that the present and the future is more important for us than the past, good or bad, — Sergei Kuznetsov is sure.

The main thing for VDNKh today is the upheaval of the existing area and filling it with new contents: the largest in Europe skating rink, new interactive museums in reconstructed pavilions.

Today VDNKh is the ground where people experiment, remake, construct. It is really time to stop making culture a battlefield for politicians.

Elena MATSEIKO

Related publications

PARTNERS

UP