Enes
Moscow
WINNER OF THE RF MINSTROY MEDIA COMPETITION 2016
Go to mobile

LATEST NEWS

23:42 22-03-2017
Norway permits one of Russia’s richest man to develop Dvalin gas field
22:49 22-03-2017
Stroytransneftegaz built 50% of its Power of Siberia’s section ahead of schedule
22:08 22-03-2017
Ukrainian companies to be supplied with coal from South Africa
21:30 22-03-2017
British millionaires predict positive effect of Brexit on their capital
20:07 22-03-2017
Xiaomi opens second plant for smartphone production in India
19:14 22-03-2017
Russia's first cinema with a cylindrical screen to appear in Zaryadye Park
17:46 22-03-2017
Russia ready to cooperate with all partners over Nord Stream — Putin
17:21 22-03-2017
Russia and Egypt plan to prepare contracts for El-Dabaa NPP within two months
17:03 22-03-2017
UPS builds new terminal in Salt Lake City
16:48 22-03-2017
Businessmen strive to invest in Golf Resort in Gelendzhik
16:13 22-03-2017
Chairman of BASF to discuss with Vladimir Putin company’s operation in Russia
15:53 22-03-2017
Copy of Reichstag to be built in Russian Patriot Park by April 23
15:10 22-03-2017
Rosatom plans to produce 3D-printer of new generation by year-end
14:29 22-03-2017
Wintershall considers options for support of Nord Stream-2 project
13:48 22-03-2017
$87м medical cluster to be built in Moscow region within three years
12:55 22-03-2017
Japanese rehabilitation center to open in Russian city of Vladivostok this year
12:17 22-03-2017
Cottage of Russian billionaire robbed in French resort of Courchevel
11:29 22-03-2017
Mysterious ancient artifact found at Kerch Bridge construction site
10:36 22-03-2017
Greenhouses for year-round strawberry production set up in Khabarovsk region
09:41 22-03-2017
Russia to sign contracts with India on supplies of 48 Mi-17V-5 helicopters
19:40 21-03-2017
Moscow park may be named after Croatian city of Zagreb
19:20 21-03-2017
USA and Russia discuss project for Venus exploration
18:58 21-03-2017
Gazprom and Eni agree on gas supplies via Southern Corridor
18:27 21-03-2017
Dutch scientist develops concept for circular airport runways
17:55 21-03-2017
Russian region of Sverdlovsk and India to cooperate in water purification projects
17:28 21-03-2017
Belarusian President calls on to create new energy sources instead of gas and oil
17:14 21-03-2017
FSB conducts searches in St. Petersburg in new case over Presidential residence fraud
16:35 21-03-2017
Rosatom agrees on promotion of radiation technologies in Latin America
16:08 21-03-2017
$17,5m logistic hub to be built to facilitate trade between Russia and Kazakhstan
15:34 21-03-2017
Marriott sets to open 12 new hotels in Russia
All news

ARCHIVE NEWS

«    March 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Why may the State Council on construction be postponed?

logo russianconstruction.com
Why may the State Council on construction be postponed?

The President of the Estimator-Engineers’ Union, Pavel Goriachkin, shares his opinions

In February, our journal published an acute interview, “Price formation reforming for 4.7 bln: another muddle or outright corruption?” In March, the discussion continued.  

A telephone conversation

To remind you, in the interview (our most read article of the month) with our journal, the President of the Estimator-Engineers’ Union and Director of the Russian Constructors’ Association Department for expert and analytic work and price formation in construction, Pavel Goriachkin, criticized the approaches of the Federal Center for Price Formation (FCPF) in the sphere of construction and the construction materials industry to the reforming of price formation and cost estimates in construction.

Besides this, the interview contained disclosures of supposed corrupt schemes in which, from Mr Goriachkin’s point of view, dome officials and organizations are involved, including FCPF, some industrial institutes, etc.

After the publication of the interview, the Head of FCPF, Sergei Fokin (who is, by the way, a Doctor of Medical Science, an Honorary Health Official, an Honoured Doctor of the RF, and was assigned to the position last November) phoned the editorial office.  He asked us about the editorial position and got the answer that the editorial position is to give the floor to experts on this issue, one of whom is Pavel Goriachkin.

In the course of the conversation, we invited Mr Fokin to speak on the acute issues of price formation reformation in the pages of our journal. No reply to our proposal ever came.  

Did not stay long

Recently, on March 30th, there appeared on the official website of FCPF a piece which said that, “Sergei Fokin has relinquished his duties as Head of the FCPF due to a transfer to another appointment, and Irina Lishchenko, Deputy Head of FCPS, has assumed the office”.

We asked a man whose principled position was stated in the interview with our journal to comment on the news. You know who we mean - Pavel Goriachkin, the President of the Estimator-Engineers’ Union.   

Leapfrog

— Mr Goriachkin, how do you assess the developments in the Ministry of Construction, Housing and Utilities?

— For the last year and a half, the FCPS has changed heads four times: Ermolaev, then Chabdarov, then Fokin, and now Lishchenko.  

At the same time, the third Deputy Minister supervising this sphere has changed: first it was Reilyan, then Sierra, and now Khamit Mavliyarov.

And pay attention: Irina Lishchenko was appointed not as the Head of FCPS but of the PP. In fact the PP is actually the head of the organization, having the same rights and responsibilities, but the status itself means that another leader is likely to come along later.  

It strikes one that the former Vice-President of the “Olimpstroy” GC, Mavliyarov, uses his own people. One of his former workfellows, Victor Pryadein, having also occupied the position of the first vice-president of “Olimpstroy”, has already been assigned to head the NOSTROY administration. Irina Lishchenko also used to be vice-president of “Olimpstroy” and also worked with Mr Mavliyarov. The new Deputy Minister is seen to be strengthening his position in the Ministry of Construction and appointing his people to significant positions. This not something extraordinary, it’s business as usual…  

 

— At least Mr Mavliyarov is a professional constructor, which is good, isn’t it?

— I hope so, and Irina Lishchenko is a specialist in economy and finance more than in construction. Anyway, it is better than a doctor, a sportsman or a musician…

In short, a person not from our estimator-engineer community. But she has so much work – over the top! 

 

— So, we may hope that the FCPF will not hold tenders at which they will pay one of their cronies 157m of budget money for a book already written by you?  

— I cannot say…Don’t forget that the PCPF is a structure supervised by the Ministry of Construction. They are only an executive structure, and the Ministry is the concept-forming body.

I get the impression that there are not too many people willing to head the FCPF. As they say, there is no queue…

— Of course! One may go straight to jail from this post, as happened with Evgeny Ermolaev...

— Yes, this ‘holy place’ has become a bit dangerous, and nobody wants to be responsible for everybody.  This may be the reason for the delay in appointing Mr Fokin’s successor, which was more than a week and a half. All that time, the FCPF was working without a senior official. I can only sympathize with Irina Lishchenko, and how it goes, only time will tell.

 

— Do you think the Ministry of Construction, Housing and Utilities and the FCPF are coordinating their famous program “400 days”?  

 — Almost nobody talks about it now. The last time I heard about this was last December, when the structure was being supervised by Elena Sierra. Now we hear about “reformation”, “action plans”, etc, but we have not seen these plans. They have not been formalized and presented to the community. They seem to exist, but in fact…  

I suspect that there is no plan, but instead we are moving around in the dark…

 

— And what should be done in particular, to cut it short?

— In short, until we correct the costing standards database – the foundation of the whole system – all other things, such as price formation, enlarged norms and requirements, resource method, basic indices, programs and approaches, are secondary.  So why are we talking? We should correct what has been done wrong in the past.

 

— Have you got any inside information concerning the coming State Council on construction? Will there be a serious talk on price formation? And if so, when will it take place?

— I want to say that the terms of holding the State Council are not clear yet. I imagine that it will not take place until autumn.

 

— What a statement! What is it based on?

— On the fact that several groups headed by the State Council secretary, the President’s assistant, and the former Minister of Transportation of the RF, Igor Levitin, supposedly preparing the State Council Presidium are now working on different issues. All these sittings are planned, but which of them will be held first, I do not know. But I repeat that I have a strong feeling that the State Council on construction will not be held in May, nor in summer. It is likely to be put off till autumn.

 

— If this is so, what is the cause, do you think?

— I think that holding the State Council now is pointless: neither the Ministry nor the construction community have an integral understanding of the issues they should consider at the State Council. Among these are shared-equity construction, self-regulation, technical regulation, utilities, and, of course, price formation. We do not see a formulated position on any of these issues. And it is very unreasonable to come to the State Council without preparing these issues. So, holding the State Council in the near future makes no sense.

 

— Well, we shall see how events develop. Thank you, Mr Goriachkin, for your interesting commentary.

Andrei CHERNAKOV

 

Related publications

PARTNERS

UP