Enes
Moscow
WINNER OF THE RF MINSTROY MEDIA COMPETITION 2016
Go to mobile

LATEST NEWS

16:23 26-06-2017
Mongolia to join construction of Asian Super Grid
16:04 26-06-2017
$50-million stock breeding complex to be built in Russian Far East
15:40 26-06-2017
Fast neuron reactors help to make atom “green” – Rosatom’s head
15:07 26-06-2017
New bridge across Ob River in Siberia to be funded from federal budget
14:45 26-06-2017
Austrian Strabag to build musical road in Hungary
14:09 26-06-2017
Company with Turkish capital to build first phase of Saratov airport
12:55 26-06-2017
Ismailov’s mall in Las Vegas seized for debts to Bank of Moscow
12:19 26-06-2017
Jewish community gets historic synagogue in Simferopol
11:49 26-06-2017
Sales of new buildings in USA grew by 3%
11:22 26-06-2017
Georgia completes construction of its largest nuclear power plant
10:39 26-06-2017
Using Nord Stream 2, Russia takes revenge on Ukraine - Poroshenko
09:50 26-06-2017
Russian billionaire’s company buys British Holland & Barrett
16:56 23-06-2017
Cabinet of Ministers allotted land plot for construction runway-3 in Sheremetievo
16:31 23-06-2017
KamAZ to invest €50m in production in Senegal
14:46 23-06-2017
Lukoil won a tender on supply of 2,700 tons of oil to Severstal enterprises
14:17 23-06-2017
President Putin to control pipeline mating at the Turkish Stream construction
13:37 23-06-2017
Reconstruction of Moscow conservatoire to be completed
13:26 23-06-2017
Thrill rides to be built in Moscow Luzhniki
12:54 23-06-2017
Unique green roofing to be built in Moscow during renovation
12:32 23-06-2017
The Chinese participating in Moscow Metro construction
11:16 23-06-2017
Grand fraud discovered at a business centre construction site in Krasnoyarsk
18:02 22-06-2017
Rostec to restore enterprise producing acoustic equipment
17:50 22-06-2017
Seven plants to open in Dubna special economic zone
17:35 22-06-2017
Putin heads for Anapa to control Turkish Stream pipeline link-up
17:12 22-06-2017
Heineken sells its brew-house in Belarus
16:53 22-06-2017
Tesla signs preliminary agreement on plant building in China
16:35 22-06-2017
Industrial warehouse in northern Moscow put on auction for $751,000
16:02 22-06-2017
China suggests project for Changchun – Vladivostok high-speed railway
15:33 22-06-2017
Europe’s gas demand exceeds Nord Stream 2 capacity, Wintershall says
14:56 22-06-2017
Poland to demolish 500 monuments to Soviet soldiers
All news

ARCHIVE NEWS

«    June 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 

Why high quality foreign machinery is often cheaper than low quality domestic

logo russianconstruction.com
Why high quality foreign machinery is often cheaper than low quality domestic

Sales fall on the market of construction machinery and the quality of domestic equipment is being analyzed by Director General of CNIIEP (Central Research Institute of Engineering Design) DScTech Stanislav Nickolaev

Sales failure situation has been observed on the market of construction machinery lately. Especially it concerns domestic equipment. Is it only the crisis to blame? This is the topic of our talk with CNIIEP Director General, Emeritus Builder of Ruusia, DScTech Stanislav Nickolaev.

Buying domestic machinery be ready to bad service


— Mr. Nickolaev, first of all I’d like to understand why our equipment gives way to foreign one?
— You know, domestic construction machinery has its achievements, but there is one but significant drawback. There is a notion “operating costs” that is the money for maintenance, replacing of some details during the operational term. Domestic machinery has much higher exploitation expenditures than foreign.
The service of domestic machinery is poorly organized. If something got broken, for example crane hoisting system, you won’t get it on time. And the construction has stopped for the time of repair. I think, it is one of the reasons for customers choosing foreign samples.

 

— But it does not seem to be the only reason for the sharp sales failure of domestic construction machinery…
— It is not. You see, our construction complex is accustomed to superprofits. Nobody wants to work with 10—15% gains, though it is quite normal for foreign construction companies. We want all 100% and even 200%. And such approach is adopted by marketing services of machine-building plants.
Making a business-plan on production of some kinds of construction machines, a bigger than reasonable interest margin is included. And all over the world a 10—15% income is considered a very efficient investment and a 5—7 years’ pay-back term is a good result. But our producers are guided by the principle: ”I want it today, I want it now”.
The result is that domestic machinery is a little cheaper on the market than imported one, but the quality is significantly lower. Besides, there are cases when the price of imported machinery is even lower than that of domestic analogs. What bulldozer, loader, extractor will a customer buy? Of course, the one with the optimal correlation of price and quality. I’m sure, our producer should hold a more forward-looking policy.

We eliminated SNiPs (Construction Norms & Regulations) and GOSTs (federal standards) checked with time

 

— In one of your interviews you said: “We’ll never solve the problem if we constantly repeat the way having led to it”. At what stage did we lag behind? What was our mistake?
— With the collapse of the Soviet Union our construction science was practically destroyed. You see, any problem is solved in complex. The triple integrity of “technology – engineering design - operation” was destroyed.
As far as technologies are concerned, there were scientific-research institutes and design-engineering departments dealing with developments of construction machinery and equipment. In the 1990ies it was all ruined.
As to the norms and regulations, they were also reconsidered. And I am not sure that the new are better than the old ones – SniPs and GOSTs - checked with time. Any machinery bases on general technological achievements. Foreign samples are well ahead in the sphere of hydraulics, pneumatics, electronics, telematics, energy efficiency and ecological friendliness. And we are seriously lagging behind.
Besides, Russian machinery production practice bases on the obsolete socialist principle: ”Every screw produced by ourselves”. And all over the world there exists distinct specialization of labor, and the experience shows that it is much more productive, and the quality of the final product is higher.
Step by step things are getting off the dime, within MSUCE Federal innovation construction scientific and research center is being created. It gives us hope.

 

— As far as I know some research work was carried out at plants…
— Unfortunately, most of research centers and technical departments at plants have been demolished and do not exist anymore. A very worrying fact is that we have stopped being interested in technical novelties. Make a quiz: who is subscribed to technical journals at the plants? Very few. Thus we are losing.

 

— And where is the way out? Can we see the trail end of a leaving train?
— I think, we can do a lot. Many talented creative people work in the industry. But we need a definite strategy. We need stimuli to get people develop innovation samples. For example, 3-4 tax-free years for those who develop new technological decisions.
Unfortunately, we hardly can keep up with world leaders of construction machinery production, but our cargo-carrying vehicles (KamAZ, for example) are in great demand, take part in the rallies showing good results…
We used to have good crane building industry and there is still basis for it.
So, perhaps, industries where we feel confident should be singled out and effort should be directed into definite niches of the market?

 

— What do you think is the reason of Chinese construction machinery success? Why do they conquer the market so fast?
— The Chinese behave very wisely. They do not buy foreign products, nor even a technology, but a “know how”, a license for production of advanced machinery. That’s why they keep pace with novelties appearing on the market. Their machinery may be a bit worse than the one of famous brands but it corresponds to modern requirements.
And if we adopt something we domesticate assembly at best, as it happened with some kinds of motor cars.


Elena Matseiko

Related publications

PARTNERS

UP