Enes
Moscow
WINNER OF THE RF MINSTROY MEDIA COMPETITION 2016
Go to mobile

LATEST NEWS

23:42 22-03-2017
Norway permits one of Russia’s richest man to develop Dvalin gas field
22:49 22-03-2017
Stroytransneftegaz built 50% of its Power of Siberia’s section ahead of schedule
22:08 22-03-2017
Ukrainian companies to be supplied with coal from South Africa
21:30 22-03-2017
British millionaires predict positive effect of Brexit on their capital
20:07 22-03-2017
Xiaomi opens second plant for smartphone production in India
19:14 22-03-2017
Russia's first cinema with a cylindrical screen to appear in Zaryadye Park
17:46 22-03-2017
Russia ready to cooperate with all partners over Nord Stream — Putin
17:21 22-03-2017
Russia and Egypt plan to prepare contracts for El-Dabaa NPP within two months
17:03 22-03-2017
UPS builds new terminal in Salt Lake City
16:48 22-03-2017
Businessmen strive to invest in Golf Resort in Gelendzhik
16:13 22-03-2017
Chairman of BASF to discuss with Vladimir Putin company’s operation in Russia
15:53 22-03-2017
Copy of Reichstag to be built in Russian Patriot Park by April 23
15:10 22-03-2017
Rosatom plans to produce 3D-printer of new generation by year-end
14:29 22-03-2017
Wintershall considers options for support of Nord Stream-2 project
13:48 22-03-2017
$87м medical cluster to be built in Moscow region within three years
12:55 22-03-2017
Japanese rehabilitation center to open in Russian city of Vladivostok this year
12:17 22-03-2017
Cottage of Russian billionaire robbed in French resort of Courchevel
11:29 22-03-2017
Mysterious ancient artifact found at Kerch Bridge construction site
10:36 22-03-2017
Greenhouses for year-round strawberry production set up in Khabarovsk region
09:41 22-03-2017
Russia to sign contracts with India on supplies of 48 Mi-17V-5 helicopters
19:40 21-03-2017
Moscow park may be named after Croatian city of Zagreb
19:20 21-03-2017
USA and Russia discuss project for Venus exploration
18:58 21-03-2017
Gazprom and Eni agree on gas supplies via Southern Corridor
18:27 21-03-2017
Dutch scientist develops concept for circular airport runways
17:55 21-03-2017
Russian region of Sverdlovsk and India to cooperate in water purification projects
17:28 21-03-2017
Belarusian President calls on to create new energy sources instead of gas and oil
17:14 21-03-2017
FSB conducts searches in St. Petersburg in new case over Presidential residence fraud
16:35 21-03-2017
Rosatom agrees on promotion of radiation technologies in Latin America
16:08 21-03-2017
$17,5m logistic hub to be built to facilitate trade between Russia and Kazakhstan
15:34 21-03-2017
Marriott sets to open 12 new hotels in Russia
All news

ARCHIVE NEWS

«    March 2017    »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 

Architect Alexander Remizov: the state pursues square metres, forgetting about ecological sustainability

logo russianconstruction.com
Architect Alexander Remizov: the state pursues square metres, forgetting about ecological sustainability

Ecological sustainability in construction has been much spoken of lately. What does the concept involve? Why do our architects and designers not use “green” construction technologies on a wider scale? We talk about this with the Chairman of the Council on the ecologically sustainable architecture of the Architects’ Union of Russia, Alexander Remizov.

When voluntary is not pro bono

Mr. Remizov, in one of your interviews you remarked that even Belarus and Kazakhstan, to say nothing of Europe, are ahead of us in the sphere of ecological sustainability in construction. What are the causes of this? 

—The causes are in the extensive development of the home construction industry. Volume, plan, and gross output are still important on the Russian construction site. Construction objects are estimated according to a cost per square meter from the moment of commissioning of a facility. What is going on otherwise with the object doesn’t interest anybody.  Regulatory practices don’t take into account the life cycle of a building. So, expenditures on the building service, maintenance, exploitation and utilization may ultimately exceed the cost of construction many times.

— What does the notion of “the object’s life cycle” include?

— It is very important. I’d say it’s a key thing. If the assessment of the life cycle were introduced, very interesting things would result. We would learn that it is more profitable to build a more expensive object and then to exploit it cheaply for half a century due to heat saving, less expenditures on overhaul maintenance, etc. And this is a key factor directly influencing the efficiency of the industry.   

In a “sick” building, people get ill and work badly 

— Our authorities may lack ecological literacy and an understanding of the trends in world construction practices…

— The point is not enlightenment. The problem is the absence of demand in people’s attitudes to themselves, their health and their mode of life. Imagine: 90% of someone’s life is spent inside either an office or a home. And premises may have a positive or negative indoor environment.  According to our data, 30% of all buildings have “bad house syndrome”. This means that a man inside this building loses working efficiency and gets sick but often cannot define the reason for his sickness. The reason is the low quality of construction materials, higher humidity, low illumination intensity, dreadful ventilation, etc. But as soon as one starts to take care of his health all these problems go. 

The “green” approach

— From your point of view, how should a building designed according to “green” standards and norms of ecological sustainability be?

— The “green” approach lowers the negative impact of construction upon the environment due to engineering measures. First of all, this entails energy efficient and ??2-neutral buildings. The construction of “Energy+” buildings has been adopted in Europe, requiring the building of objects producing more energy than they use by 2020.

 

An ecologically sustainable approach changes the paradigm: a building is not a problem, but a solution.  It means the restoration and regeneration of the environment, and everybody wins: the people, the environment, the buildings.  This approach involves considering the whole life cycle of the object and assessing its sociocultural values - for example, its physical and mechanical properties, the quality of implementation, a healthy inner space and aesthetics guarantee a long period of exploitation. 

For an employer, the economic effects will include saving on the object’s heating and illumination and his employees’ sick leave, as they will be healthier. 

Regarding school buildings, the effect will be even greater. A ventilation upgrade of 30% will increase the educational quotient by 15%. 

Another point is convenient utilization. Nothing is eternal, and a building will serve out its term of existence. So, during its utilization it must “dissolve” into nature, decompose into its constituents, and become absolutely harmless to the environment.  

 Riding bicycles and electric cars around ecotown 

— Have you as an architect ever had an ecologically sustainable project realized?

— Yes. Recently I realized a project of an ecologically sustainable town on the Black Sea coast, in which I tried to use all the main principles of ecologically sustainable construction.

There are practically no cars in the town – they are all parked in underground garages at the entrance to the town. In residential areas, people mainly use bicycles, electric cars or walk.

All the houses are facing the sea. Only one floor faces the north - the other four face the south. Such positioning allows for ventilation of the house in natural way and passively accumulate solar heat in winter. 

The houses have “green” roofs. There is an artificial pond in the town where rain water accumulates. This is used for watering plants.  .

The project was a prize-winner in the competition for architectural works at the international architecture festival “Zodchiy” in 2013–2014.

— Do young Russian architects have interesting “green” projects?

— Of course. Our young specialists have a lot of advanced architectural ideas. By the way, we traditionally organize competitions in ecologically sustainable architecture in the “Zodchiy” festival, and we find talented architects. 

I must say that young people are against conservative methods of design. They want to work according to world design standards, which are strict about ecological sustainability. 

This year the Architects’ Union of Russia and the non-commercial partnership, “The Council for ecologically sustainable architecture” have, for the first time, established a national prize in the sphere of ecologically sustainable architecture, “ARCHI-sustainability”, with prize money of 250 thousand rubles and a laureate memorial sign. The main criteria are: the creation of a natural integral environment for life-sustaining activity, forming the architectural image of ecologically sustainable building, and architectural efficiency during the whole life cycle.  

— As far as I know, ecologically sustainable construction lays claim to the idea of a friendly environment for life-sustaining activity. What is meant by this?

— We have a great number of administrative premises, absolutely “closed” to the city, locked by lifting gates, where you can get in only with special pass-cards. All these objects may be opened by placing cafes, restaurants, libraries, and clubs on the ground floors of the buildings. Such “openness” would add to the creation of a friendly environment.  

— I’ve heard that you have another interesting idea: to open the Kremlin embankment to the public…

— Indeed. On weekdays the embankment is jammed with cars, and on weekends it could become the place for walks for Muscovites.

 

— When they are in demand. From the professional point of view, such specialists are ready. For example, there are courses in ecologically sustainable architecture in the Architects’ Union of Russia. We’ve been teaching specialists for four years.  

But the problem will hardly be solved while our state declares that we need more square metres but not quality buildings. In fact, we must take one very important decision: to introduce analysis tools and build life cycle assessment into construction regulations.  

 

Elena Matseiko 

 

Photo by Alexander Remizov, taken from the project “Kovcheg” (“The Ark”)

Related publications

PARTNERS

UP